Perhaps we can go for more details about what the chipping out looks like.
Is every vertical and every horizontal joint being eroded?
Or are there cracks developing around the circumference of the ladle?
Or is the chipping out more prevelant in one area like in the stir quadrant?
our use of 97.5% purity fused MgO and 98% purity Fused MgO suggest best in class MgO.
Also key is the purity and crystal size of the graphite. A large coarse flake graphite of intermediate purity, not necessarily the highest purity available, should offer better oxidation resistance as the impurity in the flaked graphite is SiO2 and SIO2 will provide some protection against anti-oxidants.
The particle size and amounts of anti-oxidants will affect oxidation resistance; thermal expansion and hot strength. As your ladles seem to be going cold and empty for extended periods, I would expect some addition of Al and Si to help retard oxidation of the cabon.
Construction design can also affect joint erosion as the design affects stress distribution:
Spiral construction is quickest to install but worst for structural integrity. This is especially true for ladles with poor lip ring retainers.
MiniKeys that are keyed to cloe each ring will provide a more stable lining AND they can be run to a thinner wear profile for longer life versus semi universal construction as the semi u bricks lose structural integrity when they get beyind 50% or so of the original wear profile.
The best construction is in my opinion arch brick construction. Arches have the advantage that the greatest number of joints are in the vetical dimesnsion so hoop stresses are more uniformily distributed.
In the USA, there is a trend to lower purity 96.8% fused magnesia as a cost savings - the problem with this is that there is a resulting increase in SiO2 inthe bricks and the bricks are more prone to cracking. To combat vertical cracking that occurs about every 750mm to 1000mm around the circumference, some success has been achieved by increasing the graphite levels by 2-4%.
Vertical cracks were observed in middle of many bricks.
However,in the current ladle,after all the steps we had taken,the over all metal zone is in very good condition except chip out in 1 or 2 pockets in the purging side.
Yes,we had chosen best fused magnesia with C/S ratio 1.9-2.
Natural flake graphite used was of -196 grade with about 88 % passing through the 100 mesh screen.Fixed carbon tested was about 96.20 %.So,from your suggestion,it seems,we should have used -192 or -194 grade graphite.
I carefully note down your suggestion on anti-oxidant.We had used about 1.2 % Aluminium powder and 0.8 % Silicon metal powder in slag zone bricks as the plant makes Si : Al killed steel in the ratio of 70: 30 .
No anti-oxidant was used in metal zone and bottom bricks.
Yes,mini key bricks 7/8 and 7/30 are used in both metal and slag zone as per customer's requirement.However,our lining expert says that due to the condition of ladle shells,7/40 would have served better in place of 7/30.
FM 96.8 with higher carbon content is very useful.I am thinking in this direction as many customers want to buy cheaper bricks and we need to find solution.Normally 8-10 and 12-14 % final carbon are retained in metal zone and slag zone bricks.So,for lower purity FM,what % of final C you wll recommend for bottom,metal zone and slag zone bricks ?
I have one more question.What are the advantages of using +196/+195/+194( 80 % min retained on 100 mesh screen) graphite in place of -194/-195/-196(min 80% passes through 100 mesh) in magnesia carbon bricks?
And what are the advantages of using +895 graphite in place of + 195 graphite.I mean how larger flake lengths help in magnesia carbon bricks.I am perplexed because now people are doing research and developing bricks by using Nano graphite(3 D graphite)particles.
Is every vertical and every horizontal joint being eroded?
Or are there cracks developing around the circumference of the ladle?
Or is the chipping out more prevelant in one area like in the stir quadrant?
our use of 97.5% purity fused MgO and 98% purity Fused MgO suggest best in class MgO.
Also key is the purity and crystal size of the graphite. A large coarse flake graphite of intermediate purity, not necessarily the highest purity available, should offer better oxidation resistance as the impurity in the flaked graphite is SiO2 and SIO2 will provide some protection against anti-oxidants.
The particle size and amounts of anti-oxidants will affect oxidation resistance; thermal expansion and hot strength. As your ladles seem to be going cold and empty for extended periods, I would expect some addition of Al and Si to help retard oxidation of the cabon.
Construction design can also affect joint erosion as the design affects stress distribution:
Spiral construction is quickest to install but worst for structural integrity. This is especially true for ladles with poor lip ring retainers.
MiniKeys that are keyed to cloe each ring will provide a more stable lining AND they can be run to a thinner wear profile for longer life versus semi universal construction as the semi u bricks lose structural integrity when they get beyind 50% or so of the original wear profile.
The best construction is in my opinion arch brick construction. Arches have the advantage that the greatest number of joints are in the vetical dimesnsion so hoop stresses are more uniformily distributed.
In the USA, there is a trend to lower purity 96.8% fused magnesia as a cost savings - the problem with this is that there is a resulting increase in SiO2 inthe bricks and the bricks are more prone to cracking. To combat vertical cracking that occurs about every 750mm to 1000mm around the circumference, some success has been achieved by increasing the graphite levels by 2-4%.
Vertical cracks were observed in middle of many bricks.
However,in the current ladle,after all the steps we had taken,the over all metal zone is in very good condition except chip out in 1 or 2 pockets in the purging side.
Yes,we had chosen best fused magnesia with C/S ratio 1.9-2.
Natural flake graphite used was of -196 grade with about 88 % passing through the 100 mesh screen.Fixed carbon tested was about 96.20 %.So,from your suggestion,it seems,we should have used -192 or -194 grade graphite.
I carefully note down your suggestion on anti-oxidant.We had used about 1.2 % Aluminium powder and 0.8 % Silicon metal powder in slag zone bricks as the plant makes Si : Al killed steel in the ratio of 70: 30 .
No anti-oxidant was used in metal zone and bottom bricks.
Yes,mini key bricks 7/8 and 7/30 are used in both metal and slag zone as per customer's requirement.However,our lining expert says that due to the condition of ladle shells,7/40 would have served better in place of 7/30.
FM 96.8 with higher carbon content is very useful.I am thinking in this direction as many customers want to buy cheaper bricks and we need to find solution.Normally 8-10 and 12-14 % final carbon are retained in metal zone and slag zone bricks.So,for lower purity FM,what % of final C you wll recommend for bottom,metal zone and slag zone bricks ?
I have one more question.What are the advantages of using +196/+195/+194( 80 % min retained on 100 mesh screen) graphite in place of -194/-195/-196(min 80% passes through 100 mesh) in magnesia carbon bricks?
And what are the advantages of using +895 graphite in place of + 195 graphite.I mean how larger flake lengths help in magnesia carbon bricks.I am perplexed because now people are doing research and developing bricks by using Nano graphite(3 D graphite)particles.
Ladle insulation , Maximum continuity , control slag , using right taphole in EAF , minimize super heat before tapping , optimize treatment time between EAF and casting , and many others from steel making side are very important for ladle life.
No comments:
Post a Comment